PVCS: PV Crystalox Solar - Alternative Energy - 7.55p/£31.5m
Shares in PVCS dropped 42% yesterday on news of weaker-than-expected demand in Germany, the biggest panel market. PVCS make "multicrystalline silicon ingots and wafers". which are used to make solar cells. I am a big detractor of "alternative energy", viewing it as a fad investment theme that is uneconomic in the real world and only exists because governments pump money into the idea. To me, the whole idea that you sell electricity back to the grid is going to look, in a few year's time, as harebrained as the notion of selling your excess grapefruits back to Tescos. It should be obvious that only centralised operations can produce economies of scale.
Now that my Alternative Energy rant is out of the way, it should be noted that PVCS has 25 years in solar tech development, so presumably it isn't a fly-by-night operation. It has only been quoted since 15-Jun-2007, though. The interesting thing about PVCS is that it's now a net-net. It has £36,2m in net cash, against a market cap of £31.5m. Its NCAV (current assets less all liabilities) is £74.1m. So it's well and truly a net-net. There's a monster spread on this share: bid 7.60p, ask 7.75p. I'll do a check-up on this company in 6 months time, and see how we get on.
Interestingly, I mentioned PVCS in a post that I wrote on 14-Nov-2010. I was looking in the top quintile of stocks that had a low "Graham Ratio" (market cap to NCAV). Their performance was "mixed", with some delisting for unknown reasons, possibly at substantial profits, possible at substantial losses. I said that there were 4 net-nets, 3 of which were housbuilders. Alas, I didn't identify the remaing company. Actually, the housebuilders seem to have acquitted themselves quite well YTD, having mostly risen (TW. Taylor Wimpey is up nearly 16%) whilst the market has fallen 7%. RCG (RCG Holdings) has been an ongoing unmitigated disaster, falling from 30.25p in November to 3.71p as of yesterday.
CWR: Ceres Power - Electronic & Elect Equipment - 17.5p/£15.1m
According to Google Finance, it:
is principally engaged in the development and commercial exploitation of micro generation products based on the Company’s solid oxide fuel cell technology.... whatever that means. The company has been listed since 03-Dec-2004. Shares have dropped 51% over the last month. The hubub reported in Bloomberg is:
Ceres’s fuel cells won’t be commercially available until the first half of 2014. The Horsham, England-based company said in March 2010 that they would be available in the second half of this year. The cells provide heat and power for homes.CWR is another net-net, having cash of £26.7m, and a NCAV of £22.7m. The company has minimal revenues (less than £1m), and has never reported a profit. That will probably rule it out as a net-net possibility.
AGK: Aggreko - Support services - 1709.5p/£4.6bn
OK, now onto a company that wont make your belly twist into a knot. According to Google Finance, its trading activities are:
Aggreko plc is engaged in the rental of power generation and temperature control equipment.Finally, something that makes sense. The numbers are very impressive:
| AGK | ||
| Current | 5 yr median | |
| PER | 20.4 | 18.8 |
| ROE | 25% | 27% |
| Operating Margin | 26% | 22% |
| Gearing | 29% | |
| z-score | 5.64 | |
| Net cash/mkt cap | -6% | |
| Net cash/net profit | -1.5 | |
| NCAV/MKT | -3% | |
| Insiders | £13m | |
| Growth over years: | 5 | 10 |
| -revenue | 23% | 18% |
| - operating profit | 37% | 23% |
| - EPS (adj) | 42% | 26% |
| Dated: | 22/10/2011 |
At a PER of 20.4, it's not cheap. Looking at the balance sheet, intangibles account for 5% of total assets - which seems very low when you look at most companies. So, it hasn't gone out on any big spending sprees. At first flush, it looks like one of those companies where you think to yourself: "solid balance sheet, good solid business generally, if I could get 10 such companies at a PER of around 15 I'll probably do very well".
HLMA: Halma - Electronic and Electrical Equip - 331.30p/£1.25bn
Trading activities according to Google Finance:
The Company operates in three sectors: health and analysis, infrastructure sensors and industrial safety. The Company makes products, which detect hazards to protect assets and people in public and commercial. The Company’s sub-sectors include water, photonics, health optics, fire detection, security sensors, gas detection, bursting disks and safety interlocks.Another solid company. Here are some stats that I currently favour when looking at growth companies:
| HLMA | ||
| Current | 5 yr median | |
| PER | 14.8 | 14.8 |
| ROE | 21% | 22% |
| Operating Margin | 20% | 19% |
| Gearing | 10% | |
| z-score | 4.93 | |
| Net cash/mkt cap | -3% | |
| Net cash/net profit | -0.5 | |
| NCAV/MKT | -5% | |
| Insiders | £4m | |
| Growth over years: | 5 | 10 |
| -revenue | 10% | 8% |
| - operating profit | 11% | 10% |
| - EPS (adj) | 13% | 10% |
| Dated: | 22/10/2011 |
The numbers aren't as impressive as AGK, and there is a lot more intangibles, but overall the numbers look good. Balance sheet looks fine debt-wise, and investors have been getting double-digit growth over the last decade. The business is what I call a "sensible" one, making all those little fiddly bits and bobs that no-one seems to pay much attention to. Its price multiple doesn't look excessive, and has been trading at around 15X for the last decade. A fair price for a good business. YTD, the share price has performed about in line with the Footsie. It reached a peak in July, and has since then underperformed the market. The share price had gotten ahead of itself, when the valuation levels were too rich. At these levels, it looks like HLMA will be a solid, if unspectacular, compounder. Not a bad one to have in a diversified portfolio, I would say.
IMI: IMI - Industrial Engineering - 778.5p/£2.5bn
Trading activities according to Google Finance:
Its businesses consist of five platforms organized into two principal activities: Fluid Controls, consisting severe service, fluid power and indoor climate; and retail dispense, consisting of beverage dispense and merchandising. Severe service designs, manufactures, supplies and service critical control valves and associated equipment. Fluid power designs, manufactures and supplies of motion and fluid control systems for original equipment manufacturers. Indoor climate designs, manufactures and supplies of indoor climate control systems and balance valves. Beverage dispense designs, manufactures and supplies of still and carbonated beverage dispense systems. Merchandising designs, manufactures and supplies of point of purchase display systems for brand owners and retailers.So, another one of those bits-and-bobs companies (not to be taken prejoritively). In fact, its returns are pretty impressive. Here's some stats:
| IMI | ||
| Current | 5 yr median | |
| PER | 10.3 | 12.7 |
| ROE | 36% | 37% |
| Operating Margin | 17% | 13% |
| Gearing | 29% | |
| z-score | 3.63 | |
| Net cash/mkt cap | -7% | |
| Net cash/net profit | -0.8 | |
| NCAV/MKT | -8% | |
| Insiders | £8m | |
| Growth over years: | 5 | 10 |
| -revenue | 6% | 2% |
| - operating profit | 12% | 9% |
| - EPS (adj) | 12% | 11% |
| Dated: | 22/10/2011 |
Followup
Seeings as I've mentioned many companies in this post, it will be worthwhile me doing a follow-up in 6 months time. Will the solid companies outperform the cheap-as-chips one? That's for Mr Market to decide. FTAS (all-Share index) currently stands at 2827 for comparison purposes.
Posts
